Decision Analysis Case Study Valley of the Sun Reviews Decision Tree

For many of the remaining topics, assignments will be in the form of case studies. These case studies are designed to provide an opportunity to engage in that topic'due south quantitative assay method, as well every bit demonstrate critical thinking and appropriate professional person communication.

Review "Decision Analysis Case Study: Valley of the Sunday Reviews" for this topic'due south instance study, a proposal to change the kinesthesia operation review process at Valley of the Sun Academy (VSA).

Based on the information presented in the example study, create a determination tree or Excel-based analysis to make up one's mind the near appropriate recommendation.

In a 500-750-word report to VSA'southward Human Resource section and the master financial officer, explain your approach and the rationale for this method. Evaluate both outcomes and how they would be applied to this conclusion. Conclude your written report with your recommendation for the review process VSA should prefer.

Gear up the assignment according to the guidelines institute in the APA Way Guide. An abstruse is not required.

This consignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric (Beneath) prior to beginning the consignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

one Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% three Satisfactory 79.00% 4 Good 87.00% five Excellent 100.00% lxx.0 %Content 20.0 %Explanation of Arroyo and Rationale An explanation of the approach and the rationale for implementing a new faculty performance review process is not included. An explanation of the arroyo and the rationale for implementing a new kinesthesia performance review process is present, but it lacks item or is incomplete. An explanation of the arroyo and the rationale for implementing a new faculty operation review process is present. An explanation of the approach and the rationale for implementing a new faculty performance review procedure is clearly provided and well-developed. An explanation of the approach and the rationale for implementing a new faculty performance review process is thoroughly developed with supporting details. 25.0 %Evaluation of Each Approach and Application to Decision An evaluation of each review procedure approach and how information technology would be applied to the determination is not included. An evaluation of each review process approach and how it would be practical to the decision is included, only it lacks detail or is incomplete. An evaluation of each review process approach and how it would be applied to the decision is included. An evaluation of each review process approach and how it would be applied to the decision is clearly provided and well-developed. A comprehensive evaluation of each review procedure approach and how it would exist practical to the decision is thoroughly adult with supporting details. 25.0 %Conclusion, Recommendation, and Decision Tree A conclusion with a recommendation and decision tree analysis for the review process that VSA should adopt is not included. A determination with a recommendation and decision tree analysis for the review process that VSA should prefer is included, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A conclusion with a recommendation and decision tree assay for the review procedure that VSA should prefer is included. A decision with a recommendation and decision tree analysis for the review procedure that VSA should adopt is clearly provided and well-developed. A comprehensive conclusion with a recommendation for the review procedure and decision tree analysis that VSA should adopt is thoroughly developed with supporting details. 20.0 %Organisation and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Evolution and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and advisable to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the newspaper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the newspaper. Thesis argument makes the purpose of the paper clear. xx.0 %System and Effectiveness 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The decision does non support the claim fabricated. Argument is breathless and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is defective. Argument lacks consequent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources accept questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, simply may accept a few inconsistencies. The statement presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but non thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion subclass the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. In that location is a shine progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are administrative. Clear and disarming argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, linguistic communication employ) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede advice of meaning. Inappropriate word pick or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in linguistic communication selection (annals) or give-and-take choice are present. Sentence structure is correct merely not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are non overly distracting to the reader. Right and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may exist present. The writer uses a variety of constructive judgement structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. x.0 %Format v.0 %Newspaper Format (use of advisable mode for the major and consignment) Template is not used accordingly or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Advisable template is used. Formatting is right, although some modest errors may exist present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting mode. All format elements are correct. five.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., equally appropriate to assignment and mode) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as advisable to consignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, every bit appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may exist present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, equally advisable to assignment and style, and format is free of mistake. 100 %Full Weightage

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the trouble and a clear argument of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a articulate statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Employ of font, color, graphics, furnishings, etc. to heighten readability and presentation content is splendid. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Boilerplate Score

50-85%

forty-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is petty integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing enquiry are included. Summary of information presented is included. Determination may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, simply no structure is credible. The use of font, colour, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The groundwork and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but at that place is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are non included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is ofttimes detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may non be met